Art, fine, but fine art?
PFUCKA, George! It's not gonna be the same without you.
-----
And now on to the subject of art.
Recently, someone on one of my boards recently posted some really nice pics of his hometown of Oslo. They included sculpture by a bloke named Gustav Vigeland.

Wonderful, powerful, tender works of nude figures - usually families - like the dad above, toting his two babies. Well it sparked a discussion on how that sort of thing wouldn't fly over here and I wondered, as I often do, about why folks have such a problem with the nude, non aroused, human form. Especially in art.
I mean it's fucking art, for fuck's sake! Shit.
Why would a marble tit offend you? Or a bronze penis in repose? Who gives a great flying fuck at the moon? Does a copper cootch (or a plaster pudenda) in a park somewhere affect your lifestyle adversly?
So Vigeland's on my list of faves.
I also like Spencer Tunick, the bloke who poses all the nude people and photographs them. How cool a job is that?

Recently, I re-discovered an artist and learned that he had a decidedly bawdy side. w00t!
He's Aubrey Beardsley of the elegant Art Neuveau style. I had NO idea that he had done mostly erotica. He's definately my kinda artist:

I'm lovin' the little guy on the left!
So, what's your opinion of nudity in art? I'm not talking about Beardsley type stuff that is clearly erotica. I mean just nekkid peoples. Sculpted, painted, photographed, whatever.
Labels: Penises, Random crap

Or have all the examples they've seen been so depressingly small that Mr 
Well, I'm having a crap-fucking-tastic day. Seriously. My life has sucked llama arsehole for 3 months now.





